Expert Review: Pigeon Aster 2-Burner Stove – A Critical Safety Warning (AVOID)

November 15, 2025

8 Views 0

SaveSavedRemoved 0

Overall Expert Rating: 2.5/10

Amazon Sale

Up to 48% off

Pigeon Aster Gas Stove 2 Burner with High Powered Brass Burner, Gas Cooktop with Glass Top and Powder Coated Body, black, standard (14266)

View Offer

Pigeon Aster 2-Burner Review: AVOID (Critical Safety & Fire Risk Warning)

As a professional appliance reviewer, I analyze products on a balance of price, features, and safety. The Pigeon Aster 2-Burner (14266), at its tempting Amazon India price of ~₹1,549, looks like the perfect budget-friendly upgrade to a modern glass-top stove. It’s ISI Certified, comes from a major brand (Pigeon), and includes a 2-year warranty.

On paper, it’s a fantastic deal. In reality, based on my analysis of its components and a disturbing pattern of widespread user feedback, this product is a significant and unacceptable risk.

This review is not just an evaluation; it is a strong buyer-beware warning. The low price is not worth the high risk of functional failure and, most alarmingly, fire and gas leak hazards.

Rating	Score (out of 10)	Expert Insight
Performance (Flame)	3/10	Widespread reports of “very low flame,” rendering it useless.
Build Quality & Durability	2/10	“Broken stands” and “knobs failing in 8 days” are unacceptable.
Safety	1/10	CRITICAL FAILURE. Reports of “knob fires” and “gas leakage” make this a product to avoid at all costs.
Value for Money (VFM)	1/10	A product that fails or is unsafe has no value, regardless of its low price.
Overall Score	2.5/10	(Avoid. The 2.5 points are for the warranty and ISI certification on paper.)

1. The Price & Market Context: The “Glass-Top Trap”

At ~₹1,549, the Pigeon Aster is priced to kill. It’s aimed at the first-time buyer or the person upgrading from an old steel stove, luring them with a “sleek, 6mm toughened glass” look for the same price as a basic steel model.

However, this price is achieved by catastrophic compromises in three critical areas: component quality, quality control (QC), and, most importantly, safety.

2. In-Depth Analysis: A Pattern of Critical Failures

The marketing claims “High-Powered Brass Burners” and “Sturdy Pan Supports.” The user-reported reality is a stove that is dysfunctional and dangerous.

Failure 1: The “Very Low Flame” Problem

A consistent and deal-breaking complaint is that the burners—even the “big” one—produce a very low, weak flame. This makes cooking an exercise in frustration. Boiling water can take an excessively long time, and high-heat cooking (like tadkas or stir-frying) is impossible.

Expert Diagnosis: This isn’t a simple defect; it points to a systemic design flaw, likely in the gas valve, the mixing tube, or the burner head itself. It fails at its one primary job: to provide a hot, usable flame.

Failure 2: The “Flimsy” Build Quality

The “Sturdy Pan Supports” and “Skid Proof Legs” are a key promise.

The Reality: User reports of “broken stands” and “knobs failing within 8 days” are rampant. The knobs are made of cheap nylon that appears to be brittle and not heat-resistant. The “skid-proof” legs (often just plastic caps) are reported as broken on arrival or failing shortly after, making the stove wobbly and unstable.

Failure 3: The “CRITICAL” Safety Hazard (Gas Leaks & Knob Fires)

This is the most alarming part of my analysis.

Gas Leakage: Multiple users report a smell of gas from the unit, indicating poor seals on the knobs or the internal manifold. This is a Class 1 safety hazard.
“Knob Fires”: This is a term I have seen specifically associated with this model. Users report the nylon knobs themselves catching fire while the burner is in use. This implies the knobs are not adequately heat-resistant and are placed too close to the flame path, creating a direct fire risk on the stove’s main control point.

Expert Verdict: When you combine “gas leakage” with “knobs that catch fire,” you have a product that should not be on the market. The ISI Certification is baffling in the face of this feedback, suggesting either a massive failure in post-certification quality control or a flaw that the standard test did not catch.

3. The 2-Year Warranty: A Safety Net or a Red Flag?

The 2-year warranty is the only reason anyone should even glance at this product. However, ask yourself:

Is it worth the hassle of a warranty claim for a knob that broke in 8 days?
Is a 2-year warranty a fair trade for a stove that leaks gas or catches fire?

The warranty is a safety net for functional failure, but it is not a substitute for safety-by-design.

4. Final Expert Recommendation: DO NOT BUY THIS STOVE

My professional recommendation is unequivocal: AVOID THE PIGEON ASTER 14266.

The pattern of user complaints points to fundamental design flaws and poor-quality components that create a significant risk of fire and gas leaks. The “low flame” issue makes it functionally useless, and the “broken stands” make it unstable.

What to Buy Instead?

If your budget is this tight (~₹1,500), DO NOT buy a budget glass-top stove. The money is spent on the look of the glass, not the quality of the components.

Instead, buy a simple, heavy-gauge Stainless Steel 2-Burner Stove, like the Pigeon Aspire (which has its own quality issues but fewer safety complaints) or, better yet, a basic model from a brand like Prestige (e.g., the Prestige Gt-Svachh) or Sunflame. A durable steel body will outlast this flimsy glass top and is far safer.

This is a rare case where a product’s low price and brand name actively hide its high risk.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

Q1. What is the price of the Pigeon Aster 2-Burner stove?

A. The Pigeon Aster is an ultra-budget stove, typically selling for around ₹1,549 (in ₹) on Amazon India.

Q2. Is the Pigeon Aster gas stove safe?

A. While it is ISI Certified, we do not recommend this stove due to significant safety concerns. There are multiple user reports of gas leaks and knobs catching fire.

Q3. Why is the flame on my Pigeon Aster stove so low?

A. This is the most common functional complaint. It is likely due to a design flaw or poor-quality gas valves and mixing tubes, which results in a very weak flame that is not effective for most cooking.

Q4. What is the 2-year warranty for?

A. The 2-year warranty covers manufacturing defects. However, many users report knobs and legs breaking within weeks, which should be covered but requires you to go through the warranty claim process.

Q5. Is the build quality of the Pigeon Aster good?

A. No. Based on extensive user feedback, the build quality is very poor. The “sturdy” pan supports and “skid-proof legs” are reportedly flimsy and prone to breaking.

Q6. Should I buy this stove if I am a student or bachelor?

A. We would advise against it. Even for light use, the risk of gas leaks or knob fires is not worth the low price. A simple, full-body stainless steel stove is a safer and more durable choice for a similar price.

Q7. Is this stove compatible with PNG (Piped Natural Gas)?

A. No. The product is explicitly listed as LPG compatible only. While it can be converted by an authorized technician (for a fee), we would not recommend investing any further money in this particular model.

Q8. What is a better alternative to the Pigeon Aster?

A. If your budget is under ₹2,000, we recommend avoiding glass-top models altogether. Look for a full-body, heavy-gauge stainless steel stove from a reputable brand like Prestige or Sunflame. They are more durable and generally safer at this price point.